<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Philosophy - Category - Hack it!</title><link>http://xllyu.org/categories/philosophy/</link><description>Philosophy - Category - Hack it!</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>lyu@xllyu.org (Xinliang Lyu)</managingEditor><webMaster>lyu@xllyu.org (Xinliang Lyu)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2024 12:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://xllyu.org/categories/philosophy/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2023 Summary of Spirituality — Bible, Dostoevsky and Hindu culture</title><link>http://xllyu.org/posts/2023-summary-of-spirituality-bible-dostoevsky-and-hindu-culture/</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2024 12:19:18 +0000</pubDate><author>Xinliang Lyu</author><guid>http://xllyu.org/posts/2023-summary-of-spirituality-bible-dostoevsky-and-hindu-culture/</guid><description><![CDATA[<h2 id="newton-and-god">Newton and God</h2>
<p>In modern people&rsquo;s mind, science like fundament physics and spirituality (or mysticism) like the Bible are contradictory to each other.
From my experience of interacting with my physicist friends and colleagues here in Japan, I think this perception is correct.
At least, most physicists aren&rsquo;t interested in spirituality.</p>
<p>However, there is a very crucial exception. When studying Newtonian physics in high school, I was not satisfied with learning just from the textbook and went on browsing through Newton&rsquo;s <em>Principia</em>.
I was shocked when reading an essay, known as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Scholium" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "><em>General Scholium</em></a>, attached to respond some of the criticism to the first edition.
There is a whole paragraph saying that one of the purpose of <em>Principia</em> is understanding <em>Lord God</em>:</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>